Interview with Prereg Challenge Award Winner Dr. Allison Skinner

March 27th, 2017, David Mellor


allison-cropped

Dr. Allison Skinner is a postdoctoral research associate in the Social Cognitive Development lab and the Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences at the University of Washington. Written together with Andrew Meltzoff and Kristina Olson, her paper “Catching” Social Bias, Exposure to Biased Nonverbal Signals Creates Social Biases in Preschool Children appears in February’s issue of the journal Psychological Science.


Below, Dr. Skinner describes the work and why she and her colleagues preregister their work.


COS: What is your research about?

AS: We wanted to know whether exposure to biased nonverbal signals (favoring one person over another) would lead children to develop social biases. Our results indicated that preschool children who observed an unfamiliar adult display positive nonverbal signals (e.g., smiling, leaning in) toward one unfamiliar adult and negative nonverbal signals (e.g., leaning away, scowling) toward another unfamiliar adult, subsequently favored the adult who received positive nonverbal signals. We also found that this social bias generalized to others, such that children also preferred the friend of the person who received positive nonverbal signals to the the friend of the person who received negative nonverbal signals.


COS: Why did you preregister your work?

AS: Shortly before we began this project we decided to begin preregistering most all of our studies. We thought it could aid in publication and that it is generally good scientific practice.  


COS: What benefits did you obtain from preregistering your work?

AS: Since I began preregistering my studies I have observed a number of benefits.  I think the most important is that we are making more careful and well-reasoned decisions when designing studies. Although I am no longer eligible for the Preregistration Challenge (because I already received a prize), I continue to use the Preregistration Challenge Template because it provides such a thorough inventory of issues to consider before launching a new study. On several occasions we have revised methodology or changed a DV based on things that came to our attention in the process of preparing a preregistration. It has also been helpful at other stages of my projects. Once the data is collected and we are working on analyzing data and writing up results it is helpful to have detailed documentation of our exact a-priori analytical plan.  Even projects that seem very simple and straight forward can end up having quite a bit of flexibility in the way we analyze the data and present the results - having an established plan helps us (as well as reviewers and readers) delineate which analyses are confirmatory and which are exploratory.  


COS: What challenges did you face when creating your preregistration? How did you overcome them?

AS: Doing a preregistration for the first time can feel like a lot of work. When it is not part of our regular routine before launching a study it can feel like a big obstacle, maybe even a waste of time. But once it becomes part of your routine it no longer feels so taxing, it is simply another step in the research process. People can also feel intimidated by the thought of committing themselves to a specific analysis plan in advance - but after getting used to it I find it helpful. It is good to have a record of what we had planned, and if we feel strongly that something should be done differently we can still do that - we just need to provide justification for that when we publish it.


COS: What would you say to researchers who are about to start their first preregistration?

AS: I would say that they should do a detailed preregistration document (e.g., like the Preregistration Challenge Template). I can see the appeal of a short/open-ended preregistration, but doing a longer and more detailed preregistration really forces you to think through your research questions carefully, which can end up saving you time and resources in the long run. If you do a really short/simple preregistration you miss out on this benefit.

Recent Blogs

The Content of Open Science

What Second Graders Can Teach Us About Open Science

What's Going on With Reproducibility?

Open Science and the Marketplace of Ideas

3 Things Societies Can Do to Promote Research Integrity

How to Manage and Share Your Open Data

Interview with Prereg Challenge Award Winner Dr. Allison Skinner

Next Steps for Promoting Transparency in Science

Public Goods Infrastructure for Preprints and Innovation in Scholarly Communication

A How-To Guide to Improving the Clarity and Continuity of Your Preregistration

Building a Central Service for Preprints

Three More Reasons to Take the Preregistration Challenge

The Center for Open Science is a Culture Change Technology Company

Preregistration: A Plan, Not a Prison

How can we improve diversity and inclusion in the open science movement?

OSF Fedora Integration, Aussie style!

Replicating a challenging study: it's all about sharing the details.

How Preregistration Helped Improve Our Research: An Interview with Preregistration Challenge Awardees

Some Examples of Publishing the Research That Actually Happened

Are reproducibility and open science starting to matter in tenure and promotion review?

The IRIS Replication Award and Collaboration in the Second Language Research Community

We Should Redefine Statistical Significance

Some Cool New OSF Features

How Open Source Research Tools Can Help Institutions Keep it Simple

OSF Add-ons Help You Maximize Research Data Storage and Accessibility

10 Tips for Making a Great Preregistration

Community-Driven Science: An Interview With EarthArXiv Founders Chris Jackson, Tom Narock and Bruce Caron

A Preregistration Coaching Network

Why are we working so hard to open up science? A personal story.

One Preregistration to Rule Them All?

Using the wiki just got better.

Transparent Definitions and Community Signals: Growth in the Open Science Community

We're Committed to GDPR. Here's How.

Preprints: The What, The Why, The How.

The Prereg Challenge Is Ending. What's Next?

We are Now Registering Preprint DOIs with Crossref

Using OSF in the Lab

Psychology's New Normal

How Open Commenting on Preprints Can Increase Scientific Transparency: An Interview With the Directors of PsyArxiv, SocArxiv, and Marxiv

The Landscape of Open Data Policies

Open Science is a Behavior.

Why pre-registration might be better for your career and well-being

Interview: Randy McCarthy discusses his experiences with publishing his first Registered Report

Towards minimal reporting standards for life scientists

Looking Back on the Prereg Challenge and Forward To More Credible Research

OSF: Origin, growth, and what’s next

A Critique of the Many Labs Projects

The Rise of Open Science in Psychology, A Preliminary Report

Strategy for Culture Change

New OSF Registries Enhancements Improve Efficiency and Quality of Registrations

Registered Reports and PhD’s – What? Why? How? An Interview with Chris Chambers

How to Collaborate with Industry Using Open Science

How to Build an Open Science Network in Your Community

Seven Reasons to Work Reproducibly

COS Collaborates with Case Medical Research to Support Free Video Publishing for Clinicians and Researchers

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.