The Content of Open Science

January 10th, 2017, David Mellor


team-pano-14000

Over the past three years, we’ve seen the beginning of a culture change toward more open and transparent research practices. Major funders are mandating more access to scientific data. More and more researchers are finding the value of open science and are training the next generation to make their work more rigorous and open.


We at the Center for Open Science are proud of the work we have accomplished and of our role in the field. Our flagship product, the Open Science Framework, has matured into a robust scholarly commons that helps researchers coordinate complex projects, preserve the fruits of their scientific labors, and make all of their work more discoverable. Its evolution has required a lot of great work, and has already extended into OSF Preprints, OSF Institutions, OSF Meetings, and OSF Registries. In the future it will connect even more of the tools that researchers use every day.


But we do more than make the OSF, and we want to share this work and the lessons we’re learning. We’re working with a broad community to make outputs of the scientific process discoverable through the rapidly growing SHARE database. By working with a broad community of stakeholders, dozens of organizations and hundreds of journals have committed to promoting transparency and openness by signing on to the TOP Guidelines. We support badges that highlight and reward best practices in open science and are offering $1,000 prizes through the Preregistration Challenge for researchers to try out a new step in their workflow.


Everything that we’re doing supports our mission of improving the transparency and rigor of scientific research. Our team continues to grow (and we want it to grow some more!), so now’s the time to start a regular series of posts about what we’re up to. We hope that by regularly sharing these activities, we’ll be able to broaden the community engaged with us.


In the coming posts, we’ll be sharing lessons from the first year of the Preregistration Challenge. We’ll be highlighting the work of our statistical consulting team and sharing best practices in open, reproducible research. We will bring back insights from around the globe as we travel to conferences, workshops and development efforts.


If you’d like to hear about anything specific we’re working on, or if you want a venue to write a post as a guest author, let us know! Just email us (contact@cos.io).


Recent Blogs

The Content of Open Science

What Second Graders Can Teach Us About Open Science

What's Going on With Reproducibility?

Open Science and the Marketplace of Ideas

3 Things Societies Can Do to Promote Research Integrity

How to Manage and Share Your Open Data

Interview with Prereg Challenge Award Winner Dr. Allison Skinner

Next Steps for Promoting Transparency in Science

Public Goods Infrastructure for Preprints and Innovation in Scholarly Communication

A How-To Guide to Improving the Clarity and Continuity of Your Preregistration

Building a Central Service for Preprints

Three More Reasons to Take the Preregistration Challenge

The Center for Open Science is a Culture Change Technology Company

Preregistration: A Plan, Not a Prison

How can we improve diversity and inclusion in the open science movement?

OSF Fedora Integration, Aussie style!

Replicating a challenging study: it's all about sharing the details.

How Preregistration Helped Improve Our Research: An Interview with Preregistration Challenge Awardees

Some Examples of Publishing the Research That Actually Happened

Are reproducibility and open science starting to matter in tenure and promotion review?

The IRIS Replication Award and Collaboration in the Second Language Research Community

We Should Redefine Statistical Significance

Some Cool New OSF Features

How Open Source Research Tools Can Help Institutions Keep it Simple

OSF Add-ons Help You Maximize Research Data Storage and Accessibility

10 Tips for Making a Great Preregistration

Community-Driven Science: An Interview With EarthArXiv Founders Chris Jackson, Tom Narock and Bruce Caron

A Preregistration Coaching Network

Why are we working so hard to open up science? A personal story.

One Preregistration to Rule Them All?

Using the wiki just got better.

Transparent Definitions and Community Signals: Growth in the Open Science Community

We're Committed to GDPR. Here's How.

Preprints: The What, The Why, The How.

The Prereg Challenge Is Ending. What's Next?

We are Now Registering Preprint DOIs with Crossref

Using OSF in the Lab

Psychology's New Normal

How Open Commenting on Preprints Can Increase Scientific Transparency: An Interview With the Directors of PsyArxiv, SocArxiv, and Marxiv

The Landscape of Open Data Policies

Open Science is a Behavior.

Why pre-registration might be better for your career and well-being

Interview: Randy McCarthy discusses his experiences with publishing his first Registered Report

Towards minimal reporting standards for life scientists

Looking Back on the Prereg Challenge and Forward To More Credible Research

OSF: Origin, growth, and what’s next

A Critique of the Many Labs Projects

The Rise of Open Science in Psychology, A Preliminary Report

Strategy for Culture Change

New OSF Registries Enhancements Improve Efficiency and Quality of Registrations

Registered Reports and PhD’s – What? Why? How? An Interview with Chris Chambers

How to Collaborate with Industry Using Open Science

How to Build an Open Science Network in Your Community

Seven Reasons to Work Reproducibly

COS Collaborates with Case Medical Research to Support Free Video Publishing for Clinicians and Researchers

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.