The Center for Open Science is a Culture Change Technology Company

May 19th, 2017, Brian Nosek


still-life

Last night, the Center for Open Science received the “Startup of the Year” award at the CBIC awards gala, an annual showcase of technology innovation in our home town of Charlottesville, VA.  This was COS’s third nomination for the award and final year of eligibility in the startup category.  We are very grateful to our Charlottesville community for supporting and recognizing our efforts, and very proud of the progress that we have made.

It is unusual for a organization like ours to win awards as a technology startup.  But COS is an unusual organization.  

We are a non-profit -- we are mission-driven, we do not monetize our products, and we are aiming to reshape the research culture.  We build exclusively free and open public goods for the research community.  

Simultaneously, to meet our mission, we operate like a commercial technology company.  Our team is a highly talented, committed group of developers, designers, researchers, change agents, and operations specialists.  We have an efficient, commercial-grade product development process and operate at the pace of the competitive marketplace.  We maintain a modern, enterprise-level technology stack that is starting to scale.  
team

We operate in this hybrid fashion because a non-profit monetization model (none) and a commercial operational model (fast, efficient, scalable) are both essential for our mission.  We exist to disrupt the status quo of scholarly communication with public goods infrastructure. We are fostering a new, open technological ecosystem that connects the entire research lifecycle, and will put the power of innovation into the hands of the scholarly community itself.  OSF Preprints, and the many community-run services it supports, is just one interface illustrating what is coming for many other verticals of scholarly communication such as repositories, registries, and journals.

So how can we operate with the ideals of a non-profit and the innovation, efficiency, and effectiveness of a commercial enterprise?  We are fortunate to have generous funders and donors who share our vision for transforming the scholarly communication landscape.  Our supporters recognize that disrupting a multi-billion dollar industry requires investment.  The generosity to date has established the foundational technology upon which we have begun to scale.  And, we need your help to support this transition to scale.  If we continue to execute our strategic plan, your investment in COS will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of all areas of research.  Opening the research lifecycle and fostering a marketplace for community-led innovation will provide an orders of magnitude return on investment for the social good.

On the occasion of this award, we thank the financial supporters that have made it possible to get this far.  And, anticipatory thanks to future supporters that will help us scale the products and services to meet the needs of the research community.

Here's a video of Rusty Speidel, COS Marketing Manager, accepting the award on the team's behalf. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6ENOzZVztPpXzlJTzFBdnlqS2c


Recent Blogs

The Content of Open Science

What Second Graders Can Teach Us About Open Science

What's Going on With Reproducibility?

Open Science and the Marketplace of Ideas

3 Things Societies Can Do to Promote Research Integrity

How to Manage and Share Your Open Data

Interview with Prereg Challenge Award Winner Dr. Allison Skinner

Next Steps for Promoting Transparency in Science

Public Goods Infrastructure for Preprints and Innovation in Scholarly Communication

A How-To Guide to Improving the Clarity and Continuity of Your Preregistration

Building a Central Service for Preprints

Three More Reasons to Take the Preregistration Challenge

The Center for Open Science is a Culture Change Technology Company

Preregistration: A Plan, Not a Prison

How can we improve diversity and inclusion in the open science movement?

OSF Fedora Integration, Aussie style!

Replicating a challenging study: it's all about sharing the details.

Some Examples of Publishing the Research That Actually Happened

How Preregistration Helped Improve Our Research: An Interview with Preregistration Challenge Awardees

Are reproducibility and open science starting to matter in tenure and promotion review?

The IRIS Replication Award and Collaboration in the Second Language Research Community

We Should Redefine Statistical Significance

Some Cool New OSF Features

How Open Source Research Tools Can Help Institutions Keep it Simple

OSF Add-ons Help You Maximize Research Data Storage and Accessibility

10 Tips for Making a Great Preregistration

Community-Driven Science: An Interview With EarthArXiv Founders Chris Jackson, Tom Narock and Bruce Caron

A Preregistration Coaching Network

Why are we working so hard to open up science? A personal story.

One Preregistration to Rule Them All?

Using the wiki just got better.

Transparent Definitions and Community Signals: Growth in the Open Science Community

We're Committed to GDPR. Here's How.

Preprints: The What, The Why, The How.

The Prereg Challenge Is Ending. What's Next?

We are Now Registering Preprint DOIs with Crossref

Using OSF in the Lab

Psychology's New Normal

How Open Commenting on Preprints Can Increase Scientific Transparency: An Interview With the Directors of PsyArxiv, SocArxiv, and Marxiv

The Landscape of Open Data Policies

Open Science is a Behavior.

Why pre-registration might be better for your career and well-being

Interview: Randy McCarthy discusses his experiences with publishing his first Registered Report

Towards minimal reporting standards for life scientists

Looking Back on the Prereg Challenge and Forward To More Credible Research

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.